True And Fair View and Its Representation as a Social Contract

Question: True and Fair View and Its Representation How Do As A Social Contract? Answer: Introduction The disputes that are in respect to social contract have been the core to the convention of the changes and the social modifications. There have been several efforts to dissolute on the perceptions of social accountability in the literature review. The paper undertakes an explanation with the component of the implication of the preciseness and significance of social contract with respect to the legitimacy theory. It is seen that the companies functioning in the economy requires to stick to the standards that have been put forward by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS), which is helpful for the preparation of a fair and precise accounting statement(Zeff 2016). The paper that is under consideration makes use of the two topic namely the True and Fair (TFV) principles and its representation as social contract and the next topic talks about the implementation and neatness of social contract in the theory of legitimacy. TFV is a kind of accounting principle and this report explains this concept by looking at the literature review prepared previously. The explanation reveals that whether TFV can be represented as social contract among the accounting personnel so that an idea can be obtained about improving the financial situation of the firm(Henderson et al., 2015). The use of this method can be useful for creating a sense of togetherness among the professional accountants who are functioning together. The next topic that is under consideration refers to the implementation and the significance of social contract in the concept of legitimacy. The paper would explain the the concept of legitimacy and will then discuss about whether social contract can be useful in enhancing the theory of legitimacy in a firm(Macve 2015). The information with respect to these two topics have in gathered from the literature review that was prepared previously and analysing the articles put forth various by various researchers. True and Fair View and its representation as a Social Contract It is known that True and Fair View (TFV) principle is a primary standard for the preparation of accounting statements and for the collection of the information. This method asks the accounting professionals to prepare their reports properly and precisely without making any mistakes. The principle is generally related to the basic four ideas of publishing the information. The basic ideas include consistency, going concern, matching and prudency. There are certain types of behaviour of standard accounting with respect to the transactions that are monetary in nature and it is seen that the accountants have a hard role to analyse a comparison with regards to the activities of the competitive firms within a specified time span(Collier 2015). TFV is well known between the professional accountant personnel as it is the basic requirement for the construction of an accounting report that is in line with GAAP and IFRS. TFV does not have any definite explanation and hence, researchers who are hailing various parts of the world compute definitions of TFV according to the generally accepted principles. These principles are granted nationally and in accordance to the culture of the country where they operate (EnglundGerdin 2014). The principle of accounting that is inherent in the country even aids in the preparation of the definition of TFV. The absence of a proper definition of TFV makes the recommendations of the accounting people important. During the final analysis of the information that is what is fair and true, it is seen that the administration has the author to undertake a decision regarding the dependence on materiality or dependability. The loyalty regarding the legal and justified utilisation of TFV is related to the wider attitude of ethics of the society. This enables the utilization and positive and negative superiority for undertaking the decisions that are in regards to the legal and generalised principle and standards (Pijper 2016). There have been arguments that whether TFV when segregated into the words true and fair does not have the same importance. The words can be segregated with ease and it is seen that the two words have different utilities. HahnKhnen (2013) has discussed that the auditors who are functioning in a firm have suggested that TFV can be segregated with ease. Chambers(2014)published that TFV is exclusive of an accurate definition and it is difficult to come to a conclusion that the accounting statements are accurate, practical and fair. Dichevet al., (2013)reveals that there are several faults that have been discovered by the analysts with the help of their intelligence and the end result concludes that TFV is qualitative in nature and there is not an exact measurement tool. Therefore, Albuet al., (2014) has published a discussion that makes sure that TFV is regarded as a legal and justified perception and the court can thus give out decisions and judgment. The legal body like the management and administration gives out various characteristics that have been explained below: Authority: The transactions that are revealed and disclosed to be authorized and are over the administration. Accurate: In this aspect all the data that has been disclosed needs to be true and fair. Complete: In this stage, it is determined that the information should not have any misplaced data during the accounting method. The accounting method that makes use of the qualities that have been discussed above have the potentiality of disclosing the actual description of the accounting reports. It is observed that there are several challenges that are inherent within the accounting reports. The financial statements may have certain qualities that are missing and hence only a particular level of sample can be undertaken(Hyndman et al., 2014). It is seen that TFV can be explained with the help of the below discussed aspects individually. Truth in Accounting The lack of uneasiness with the perspective of truth in the method of accounting has been published as one of the crucial challenges within the literature of accounting. The idea about truth with respect to accounting is a realistic ideology that has minimum openings of being implicated in the accounting process (Jones et al., 2013). With respect to the filing of the report, it is seen that financial accounting needs the avoidance of the inheritance of bias. This method of elimintatiuing bias from the accounting process is deemed difficult. The initial challenge is to gaini knowledge regarding the fact that there is no past background. The next challenge involves difficulties that are present in order to discuss them. These are the factors that makes us understand that bias has been present in the accounting process from the very beginning. The experts therefore look to stay unbiased thereby avoiding the entrance of bias in the process accounting (Grossi 2015). It is observed that neutrality is an important aspect that is deemed to be qualitative within the information of accounting. The addition of impartiality terminates bias from the accounting statements. Therefore, a document that is exclusive of bias leads to the presumed conclusions that leads to the creation of a distinct attitude and behaviour. Impartial ity is therefore, the foundation of the true worth and the completeness in the process of accounting and thus developing the accounting report. Truth in Objectivity There are four major understandings that can be discovered with the process of objectivity. Objectivity leads to the accuracy of the scatterings of statistics that is in regards to the establishment of characteristics when they are prepared with the help of several mechanisms. The discussion is seen to be suitably the vital criterion in accordance to objectivity. The process is established from the propensity with regards to accounting. It thereby gives out the information with the perspective to accounts that has characteristics of an average and assumed amount with respect to the probable dispersal (Storey et al., 2016). Hence, a conclusion can be given that financing is known as the need to avoid any secrecy as keeping any secret with respect to the information from the financial reports can construct inaccurate and faulty financial documents that have an adverse effect on the functions of the company. Fairness Fairness is a word that is known to the accountants and it means the countenance of neutrality with the professionals for the establishment of the financial accounting statements. Fairness historically means the ideology that the financial documents that are published to the accounting users should be fair by all means (Gynther 2014). The information that is gathered is seen to be fair if the data is meaningful and neutral. The method of objectivity conversely, in this aspect is looked upon like a philosophical style and is not regarded like in a manner of statistics. In a generalised sense, it is seen that the fairness theory reveals that the financial reports are not manipulated by any unethical influence or partiality. The word fairness explains that the professionals who construct the data with regards to accounting construct the accounting reports with the help of their ethical operational practices and loyal worth. This has been implied in accordance to the auditing, presentati on and manufacturing of the financial end results (Evans2013). The interpretation of the accountants is restricted to fairness while undertaking any presentation. The words fair and view is thus looked upon as the viewpoint of the process of accounting that is seen to be imperative and efficient as it brings forth the efficient process for the construction of the accounting statement (BellancaVandernoot 2013). The theory of financial accounting therefore has computed TFV. TFV is implicated for the process of analysis and making sure that accounting statements are helpful in publishing the activities of the business effectively. The implication of TFV can be undertaken with the help of the accounting system that makes use of diversified concepts and traditions that is helpful in making sure that the data with respect to accounting is declared effectively and reliably. TFV makes use of the traditional cost conventions as it is the historical method that is helpful to the process of accounting. The several other conventions that are taken into account are includes the monetary computation, segregated entity, materiality (Farjaudon Morales 2013). With respect to this topic, it is seen that TFV is looked upon as the represented as social contract. Social contract is looked upon as a traditional approach where the individuals of a society begin an unspoken contract thereby cooperating a benefit that is social in nature by compensating their personal independence (Needles et al., 20130. Social contract is looked upon as a significant characteristic as it establishes a feeling of togetherness and then aids in developing the concepts of accounting and construction of of the accounting statements. TFV theories are considered as a social contract as it compensates the manipulating risks and biases that are present internally during the construction of the report. TFV performing as a social contract is helpful for developing the statements of finance and thus aiding the administration and the management who are associated in the organization to construct and introduce several positive decisions. It is known that the principle of social contract has been going on from the historic time span as it has been looked upon as a significant tool as all the mistakes and the faults that are available in the business and the preparation of the statements of accounts are terminated. TFV, which is available within the process of accounting, is looked upon as a social contract that is existent between the business community and accounting professionals (MurphySikka 2015). It is seen that a sense of awareness is present among the accountants and the business regulators and each of the parties give up a segment of their profits thereby benefiting mutually and establishing an improved financial report that will be beneficial to both the parties. The effectiveness of TFV brings in various developments in the financial reports that are explained briefly below: The accounts and the reports that have been constructed on a yearly basis should have the statement of profit and loss, the income statement and the balance sheet with respect to several notes that are discovered within the accounts. It has been observed that the statements that have been explained needs to be inclusive of the overall composite. The ledgers and the accounts requires to be computed effectively in relation to the release that have been discussed in the standard of accounting. The report that are constructed annually in this perspective states that TFV are in regards to the assets and liabilities of a company that is taken into consideration and is even helpful for discovering the profit and loss of the company and their economic situation. In case of the scenario when the supplies that are pertinent to the accounting standard can be used by the company and the nation where they function is unable to bring forth the TFV. The disclosure is in respect to the yearly reports and thereafter adequate data is essential to be provided. The assessment of the topic in this scenario explains that TFV during the construction of the paper and the declarations of accounting is a representation of the social contracts. It is seen that it is helpful in creating a statement that will point and disclose the precise and accurate outcomes. These results will be exclusive of any bias. TFV is significant as it aids in eliminating the false reports and statements that are prepared by the accounting professionals as the judgment of the professionals can be manipulated by any factors(Chambers 2014). Conversely, it is seen that the social contract availability will abolish such situations and consequences and thereby can develop the financial situation of an organization. Explanation of application and relevance of Social Contract to the Legitimacy Theory in Accounting The explanation of the second topic in this specific study is disclosed in accordance with the theory of legitimacy and this demonstrates the implication and the significance of social contract. The financial framework of a company has gained support from the theory of legitimacy in the process of accounting. The legitimacy theory is looked upon as pertinent in relation to the implication of the social contract. The theory of legitimacy is looked upon by the companies as a activity based resource that is discovered by the firms from the cultural aspect and is is undertaken in a competitive manner in search of the organizational objectives(Frynas Stephens 2015). The firms social environment comprise of numerous actors and legitimacy is considered as an abstract theory. The theory of legitimacy has the investigation and incorporation of the specific stakeholders and the process with the help of which the movement of the resources are taken to be vital for the firms. Legitimacy is contr olled by the company as it makes sure that the actual labour flow, customers and capital are mandatory for the feasibility of the theory. It is recommended by the institutional theory of legitimacy that is in accordance to legitimacy, a company may be found in one of the four stages. The stages that are considered with the account of legitimacy can be segregated into the following phases. Legitimacy Establishment: In this stage, an initial phase of enhancement of the company is revealed and this tries to rotate around the various problems. These problems associate to competence and most of the factors are associated to the accounts(Chelli et al., 2014). In this respect, the companies require to be conscious of the standards and the demands of the quality that are established socially. This is undertaken in respect to the permitted professionalism standards. Legitimacy Maintenance: This stage is the level when most of the companies establish their functions as they are demanding to be within it. Nonetheless, the operations of the firm rotates around the prediction, foreseeing and restricting the probable threats to legitimacy. This may even be inclusive of the representative function of guarantee and the performance of the role that is ongoing(Rossi 2014). Legitimacy is regarded as a vibrant construction andits maintenance is not as simple as it looks. A firm can lose its legitimacy if the transforming style of the operations have been found to be suitable. Legitimacy Extension: It may occur that the firms requires to enter a new environment or market and undertake modifications with respect to the present market. In this scenario, it is even possible that protracted legitimacy may take place and this is regarded to be upbeatand fitting as an effort of the administration in gaining the confidence and aids from the potential constituents. Legitimacy Defending: Defence is necessary in legitimacy as it is challenged sometime by the occurrence(Fernando Lawrence 20140. When the administration of the firm is making an effort to resolve the threat, in that consequence, the operations of legitimating intends to be intense and reactive. It is has been discovered that the researchers related to the process of accounting gives a lot of stress on the last stage. It is because they have the option to gain the clear chance of investigating the vital connections among the legitimacy and resources. Disclosures that are corporate in nature are able to unpack the theory of legitimacy. Conversely, gaining knowledge about the principle is seen to be modernised and tries for the enhancement of the literature of accounts. It is given in the theory of legitimacy that entities of the business with respect to legitimacy functions in a community that depends on the implied social contracts among the community and them. According to the theory, the organizations are bounded by the social contract when the firm makes an agreement to accomplish several events that are desired communally and in return for the grant of certain rewards and other aims with respect to this(BellamyWeale 2015). It finally makes an assurance that the existence of the business unit will be present. The companies sustainably look for ensuring that they function within the regulations and the bounds that are in relation to the community and it is intended by the firm that their operations are looked to be legitimate by the exterior parties. Conversely, these bounds and policies are transforming with time and they are not taken as fixed and hence it is essential that the organizations requires to be active and responsive all the time(Sq uires 2013). There is a perception with which the theory of legitimacy is dependent on and this reveals that these is an existence of a social contract among the community where the company functions and among the companies that are in question. Social contract is taken as the theory that for revealing the gathering of the implicit and the explicit prospects that the community has on the path the firms should undertake their functions(Bice 2014). It is forecasted that the functions of the firm are sustainable and it is forecasted that the entities of the business will be able to obtain their expectation. It is looked upon by the theory of legitimacy that the units of the business need not only look at completing the demands of the stakeholders, and should mostly consider the civil liberties of the society. It is seen that if the firm is unable to comply with the socio-economic expectations, then the community may levy approval of the business units. The firms look to undertake several programs to perceive that their activities are legitimate. With regards to this, the companies would construct among the policies of acceptable attitude and the communal values that are implemented by or are linked with the operations in a wider communal system where the firm operates(Taylor et al., 2013). It has been framed by several researchers the process with which the firms look to legitimise their operations. There are several attempts that have been made with the help of interactions and for modifying the definition of social legitimacy. This is because it imitates best suited procedures, output and the values of the end result. The output and the goals of the firms requires to be accepted with the help of replicating the legitimacy definition that is prevailing in the environment. The companies tries to be recognised in the market with respect to the values, institutions and signs so that they have a firm sense of legitimacy and this is un dertaken by trying with the help of interaction. There are various experiential theories. McLoughlin(2015) has undertaken a research by establishing a connection among the theory of legitimacy and the corporate social policy disclosures. A social declaration changes from time to time or from year to year and the changes reveal an answer to the transforming anticipation of the corporate social attitude of the community. In another examination, the theory of legitimacy was exploited for undertaking alterations that are systematic in nature to the environmental declarations in the annual report of the firm(Czinkota et al., 2014). According to the theory, the declaration that concerns the environment by the firm in their annual report modifies during any social programs and the disasters that could be associated to a specific industry. The theory of legitimacy is looked upon as the situation when the system of the value of a unit is corresponding with the wider communal system value. There is a social contract among the company and the public within the communal environment. The revenue that is seen in the history of the company was looked upon as an internal measures of legitimacy. Conversely, the current system has gone far away from this theory. With respect to the present scenario, it is seen that the capability of the business unit to function with respect to the bounds and regulations that are implemented by the community and they are now being bequeathed with legitimacy(Chan et al., 2014). This is helpful for the firms in obtaining the entre to the resources and commodity markets. During the occurrence when the social contract is breached, it would lead to the withdrawal of the contract of the firm is unable to comply with the expectations of the society. A firm can introduce numerable strategies if they hav e brokentheir legitimacy and the social contracts. In this respect, it is seen that the organization looks to close the gap discovered in legitimacy and can undertake suitable adjustments and interact the prospects to the specific expectations of the public. The other strategy that can be implied by the firm is to make the society aware regarding the demonstration of the attitude of the firms. It is even seen that there are possibilities that the organizations can influence the prospects of the society and by transforming the expectations of the public. Irrespective of the strategies, undertaken by the strategies, that are explained above, it is seen that organization makes use of the disclosures of the public regarding the information that is accomplished with the help of the annual report of the firm(Parsons Moffat 2014). This is helpful in the establishment of an ostensible connection among the accounting research and the theory of legitimacy that rotates around the associated disclosures in the annual report, the firm has contain ed the outlook on the theory of legitimacy. This aids the firm in confronting the burden that is discovered from the social contract. If the declared polices and the norms of the firms are volatile to the social programs, there requires to be messages among the crucial activities and the disclosure peaks. Nonetheless, the study that is enveloped in the yearly report of the firm and this gives out the analysts with a priceless factor for the description and understanding of the declaration policy of the firm(Tester 2014). With respect to the several charitable declarations that are prepared by the firm in their annual statements, there exits an indecision within various analysts. There are two theories of legitimacy that requires to be granted for highlighting the factors that are related to social contracts. One of the theories constitute of the institutional legitimacy theories that is even regarded as the theory of legitimacy(WallenburgSchffler 2014). This concept explains that the firm has been able to obtain the trust of the society by bringing in modifications in the framework of the firm. Legitimacy and institutionalization are considered to be similar and these consequences aids in the empowerment of the firm by making them conscious and look natural and meaningful to the community. By looking at the queries and the time taken in the process of accounting that is undertaken in the research, it is seen that democratic structure of the government reveal that the research is going on the right pa th. The theory of legitimacy arise with several stages and this consist of the institutional and the organizational stage. There exist capitalism, society, government and religion at the basic level. The organizational level is regarded to be beneath the level of institution. The process of the business legitimacy aids the firms in discovering the permits or the fudging of the permits in the community of differentiated groups(Cronin De Greiff 2015). It is obvious of the information that conception of legitimacy would be created by the inclination of the maximum level of accounting research. The business legitimacy would be existent in as firm when there is a compatibility among the various value processes. The resource of the firm is provided with respect to the specific legitimacy and this aids in employing chasing their aims and thereby the company abolishes it completely from the socio-cultural environment(Parsons et al., 2014). There will be a risk to the business legitimacy when the re is probable imbalance among the various value systems. There are definite operations that aids in raising and lowering the level of legitimacy and it is seen that the lower degree of legitimacy moves towards the penalization of the power to operate as it has horrendous results for the business. The process of legitimacy is measured properly as a portion of the background for interchange as well as a by-product. The firms in order to operate efficiently as a specific amount in the communal exchange systems for which the capitals requires to have an import that that is symbolic(Clegg et al., 2015). There are several stakeholders in the firm who are accountable for managing the variable resources. The theory of legitimacy is found to be one of the various communal theories that have gained help from the social contract. This principle has been identified as the explanatory equipment of environmental; reporting that is utilised by the business concerns(Cornelissen 2014). One of the finest descriptions of the theory of legitimacy has given out that the idea that the firms look to legitimise themselves by sustainably looking to make sure that they are undertaking the activities with respect to the bounds and policies with respect to the society where the company functions. There is a significant number of perceptions and one of them is aided by legitimacy that the reporting of the policies are modified by the firms for explaining the information that their activities are dependable with any readjustment with respect to the expectation of the society and communal priorities(Muttakin Khan 2014). The business units have the objective of legitimizing their operations by looking to accomplish the dependability among the communal values and the objectives and goals and the operations of the business unit. The management and the administration looks to minimize the dangerous situations and legitimating the scheduleslook to be receptive and being robust. It is seen that most of the firms can frequently require to store the legitimacy as intended with respect to the Western Capitalist System. The society that is extensive and the various researchers are obtainable with the help of the theory of legitimacy in a particular way with the help of which the diversified corporate declarations get unloaded(Blowfield Murray 2014). The examination of the theory under consideration requires to be more innovative and modernised when analysing in various regions within the area of accounting and even outside the area of the research. Conclusion The analysis and discussion of the topics that have been provided in the case study reveals that unveiling the corporate declarations of the firm is given out by the theory of legitimacy to a vaster researchers and societies. The idea and the knowledge that is gained by making use of the theory of legitimacy is helpful for giving out better and efficient data and information so that it aids the stakeholders and the investors in undertaking fruitful and informed decisions. The society has sanctioned to gain the bungle and increased supervision and control by the method how assignment of the resources are undertaken. The explanation of the performance of the environment and the perception of the social contracts have been explained with the help of the theories of legitimacy. The paper and the report has explained that the concept of legitimacy has been found to be one of the most highlighted perception in the social and the environmental arena. The study that has been undertaken with respect to the implication of the theory of legitimacy in the firms has been useful in obtaining the widespread knowledge regarding the concepts of legitimacy that has been considered in the annual statement. The explanations that have been taken regarding the significance of this specific concept has aided in gaining knowledge regarding the notion about the public and the investors that manipulates the declaration of the norms and regulations of the firm. There have been gratitude of various degrees of legitimacy theories that have been depicted in the report. This aids the stakeholders and the management in gaining knowledge regarding how the concept of legitimacy has accredited to the firms and how the repairing and the maintenance of the legitimacy are undertaken with the help of the corporate declarations. The function of the declarations with respect to the information among the group, state and individuals are brought in to the theory. I t is gained that the real comportment of the firm is not discovered to be legitimate. The factors and the things that have been regarded as legitimate in this specific aspect is the notion of the community that aids in constructing the corporate legitimacy. The assessment of the topic that is related to True and Fair View model explains that constructing the financial document with respect to TFV looked upon as a representative of the social contract. This aids in the foundation of the report that brings forth the outcome that does not include the bias and brings forth the precise information. Hence, the inclusion of the social contract aids in developing the financial condition of the companies by abolishing the several consequences that is raised due to the existence of any materiality that is manifested in the financial document. Reference List Albu, C. N., Albu, N., Alexander, D. (2014). When global accounting standards meet the local contextInsights from an emerging economy.Critical Perspectives on Accounting,25(6), 489-510. Bellamy, R., Weale, A. (2015). Political legitimacy and European monetary union: contracts, constitutionalism and the normative logic of two-level games.Journal of European Public Policy,22(2), 257-274. Bellanca, S., Vandernoot, J. (2013). Analysis of Belgian public accounting and its compliance with International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) 1, 6 and 22.International Journal of Business and Management,8(9), 122. Bice, S. (2014). What gives you a social licence? An exploration of the social licence to operate in the Australian mining industry.Resources,3(1), 62-80. Blowfield, M., Murray, A. (2014).Corporate responsibility. Oxford University Press. Chambers, R. L. (Ed.). (2014).An accounting thesaurus: 500 years of accounting. Elsevier. Chan, M. C., Watson, J., Woodliff, D. (2014). Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures.Journal of Business Ethics,125(1), 59-73. Chelli, M., Durocher, S., Richard, J. (2014). France's new economic regulations: insights from institutional legitimacy theory.Accounting, Auditing Accountability Journal,27(2), 283-316. Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M., Pitsis, T. (2015).Managing and organizations: An introduction to theory and practice. Sage. Collier, P. M. (2015).Accounting for managers: Interpreting accounting information for decision making. John Wiley Sons. Cornelissen, J. (2014).Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice. Sage. Cronin, C., De Greiff, P. (Eds.). (2015).Inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory. John Wiley Sons. Czinkota, M., Kaufmann, H. R., Basile, G. (2014). The relationship between legitimacy, reputation, sustainability and branding for companies and their supply chains.Industrial Marketing Management,43(1), 91-101. Dichev, I. D., Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., Rajgopal, S. (2013). Earnings quality: Evidence from the field.Journal of Accounting and Economics,56(2), 1-33. Englund, H., Gerdin, J. (2014). Structuration theory in accounting research: Applications and applicability.Critical Perspectives on Accounting,25(2), 162-180. Evans, R. (2013). Accounting for ethics: Traidcraftplc, UK.Building Corporate Accountability: Emerging Practice in Social and Ethical Accounting and Auditing, 84. Farjaudon, A. L., Morales, J. (2013). In search of consensus: The role of accounting in the definition and reproduction of dominant interests.Critical Perspectives on Accounting,24(2), 154-171. Fernando, S., Lawrence, S. (2014). A theoretical framework for CSR practices: integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory.Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research,10(1), 149-178. Frynas, J. G., Stephens, S. (2015). Political corporate social responsibility: Reviewing theories and setting new agendas.International Journal of Management Reviews,17(4), 483-509. Grossi, G. (2015). Consolidated financial statements in the public sector.Public sector accounting, 63-76. Gynther, R. S. (2014).Accounting for Price-Level ChangesTheory and Procedures: Pergamon International Library of Science, Technology, Engineering and Social Studies. Elsevier. Hahn, R., Khnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: a review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research.Journal of Cleaner Production,59, 5-21. Henderson, S., Peirson, G., Herbohn, K., Howieson, B. (2015).Issues in financial accounting. Pearson Higher Education AU. Hyndman, N., Liguori, M., Meyer, R. E., Polzer, T., Rota, S., Seiwald, J. (2014). The translation and sedimentation of accounting reforms. A comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian experiences.Critical Perspectives on Accounting,25(4), 388-408. Jones, R., Lande, E., Lder, K., Portal, M. (2013). A comparison of budgeting and accounting reforms in the national governments of France, Germany, the UK and the US.Financial Accountability Management,29(4), 419-441. Macve, R. (2015).A Conceptual Framework for Financial Accounting and Reporting: Vision, Tool, Or Threat?. Routledge. McLoughlin, C. (2015). When Does Service Delivery Improve the Legitimacy of a Fragile or Conflict?Affected State?.Governance,28(3), 341-356. Murphy, R., Sikka, P. (2015). Unitary taxation: tax base and the role of accounting.Soial Science Research Network. Muttakin, M. B., Khan, A. (2014). Determinants of corporate social disclosure: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh.Advances in Accounting,30(1), 168-175. Needles, B. E., Powers, M., Crosson, S. V. (2013).Principles of accounting. Cengage Learning. Parsons, R., Moffat, K. (2014). Constructing the meaning of social licence.Social Epistemology,28(3-4), 340-363. Parsons, R., Lacey, J., Moffat, K. (2014). Maintaining legitimacy of a contested practice: How the minerals industry understands its social licence to operate.Resources Policy,41, 83-90. Pijper, T. (2016).Creative accounting: The effectiveness of financial reporting in the UK. Springer. Rossi, E. (2014). Legitimacy, Democracy and Public Justification: Rawls Political Liberalism VersusGaus Justificatory Liberalism.Res Publica,20(1), 9-25. Squires, J. (2013).Gender in political theory. John Wiley Sons. Storey, D. J., Keasey, K., Watson, R., Wynarczyk, P. (2016).The performance of small firms: profits, jobs and failures. Routledge. Taylor, I., Walton, P., Young, J. (2013).The new criminology: For a social theory of deviance. Routledge. Tester, K. (2014).Civil Society (RLE Social Theory)(Vol. 2). Routledge. Wallenburg, C. M., Schffler, T. (2014). The interplay of relational governance and formal control in horizontal alliances: a social contract perspective.Journal of Supply Chain Management,50(2), 41-58. Zeff, S. A. (2016).Forging accounting principles in five countries: A history and an analysis of trends. Routledge.